| |
|
Intelligence for the Considered Investor
The Clarmond Daily
Friday, 4 September 2026 · Weekend Edition · Est. MMXIV
|
|
S&P 500
7,667 ▲
|
FTSE 100
10,764 –
|
Gold
$4,490 ▲
|
Brent
$95.25 ▼
|
US 10-Yr
4.76% ▼
|
Sep Hike
~70% ▲
|
|
|
At Thursday's close · arrows show the day's move
|
|
The whole week has pointed to this morning's jobs report — the last evidence before the Fed weighs raising rates into a war-driven oil shock. Gold, sensing trouble, has jumped again. September has been unkind, and it is not finished.
|
On This Day |
| |
4 September 1957 — 69 Years Ago Today
On this day in 1957, Ford unveiled the Edsel, a car it had hyped for years and staked its future on. The public took one look and stayed away; within two years it was dead, a byword ever since for a confident bet on a market that had already moved. The lesson has not aged. The most expensive mistakes are made not in doubt, but in certainty.
|
|
Markets — Three Moves That Mattered |
|
Macro — The Number The Week Has Waited For
August payrolls land, and the Fed is watching
It all comes down to this morning. The United States publishes its official jobs report for August, and after a week of war, oil and hawkish talk from the Federal Reserve, rarely has a single number carried more freight. Forecasters expect something soft, perhaps forty-five thousand jobs added — a figure that would confirm the labour market is cooling. In an ordinary year, that would clinch the case for rate cuts. This is not an ordinary year. With oil near a hundred dollars and inflation stirring again, a weak jobs number may not free the Fed to ease; it may simply catch the economy between a slowdown it cannot cushion and a price rise it must still fight. Watch the market's reaction more than the number itself. It will tell you which fear is winning.
|
|
|
Commodities — Gold Comes Roaring Back
The metal jumps 2.3% before the jobs data
A week ago gold looked to have met its match, knocked back from its record by the threat of higher interest rates. On Thursday it came roaring back, leaping more than 2% as the dollar and bond yields softened ahead of the jobs report. It has been a revealing round trip. When the market feared only a hawkish Fed, gold fell; but the moment the wider picture returned to view — a widening war, an oil shock, a Fed that may have to tighten into weakness — the oldest hedge was bid up once more. Gold does not much care about any single rate decision. It cares about the sum of the risks, and this week the sum went up. Its message is the same as it has been all year: something, somewhere, is not right with the money.
|
|
|
Structural — Even Japan's Cheap Money Runs Out
Japanese bond yields hit a 30-year high
The clearest sign that an era is ending came from the country that defined it. Japan spent thirty years as the home of nearly free money, pioneering the zero interest rates and vast bond-buying that the rest of the world later copied. This week the yield on its ten-year government bond climbed to its highest since 1996. The immediate cause is political: the new prime minister, Sanae Takaichi, is promising a wave of fresh spending, and lenders are demanding more to fund it. But the deeper current is global. From Tokyo to Washington, the age of governments borrowing endlessly for next to nothing is drawing to a close, and the bill for three decades of cheap money is arriving all at once. When even Japan's bonds are cheap no longer, the ground beneath every asset has shifted.
|
|
World in Focus — Two Stories |
|
I
The Iran war spreads across the Gulf, and onto civilians
The war is widening, and its victims are increasingly the innocent. Overnight, Iran fired drones and missiles at three American allies at once — Jordan, Kuwait and Bahrain — in retaliation for the latest US strikes. One Iranian attack hit a tanker owned by Saudi Arabia's national shipping line, killing two Filipino seafarers, merchant sailors who chose no side in any of this. Iran, for its part, says an American strike hit a wedding party in the town of Kuhestak, killing four and wounding dozens. Each claim is contested, as they always are; the trend is not. Six months of a war fought at sea and around the strait is bleeding outward, into neighbouring countries and ordinary lives, and President Trump has promised a harder blow still. This is how a contained conflict stops being contained: not by decision, but by drift.
|
|
|
II
As America bombs, China courts the Middle East
While the United States drops bombs on the region, China is busy making friends in it. President Xi Jinping arrived in Egypt this week — his first visit in a decade — the latest step in a patient campaign to expand Chinese influence across a Middle East that Washington is bogging itself down in. It is a study in contrasts. America, the region's security guarantor for eighty years, is spending its standing on an open-ended war. China buys the oil, builds the infrastructure, and asks no awkward questions about how anyone governs. The Gulf states, hedging their bets, welcome both. Wars are expensive in more than money. Every month the United States spends fighting in the Gulf is a month China spends courting it, and influence, once ceded, is slow and costly to win back.
|
Power & Politics — Two Stories |
|
This Week · Bissau
Guinea-Bissau votes to hand its president more power
In one of the world's poorest and most coup-prone states, voters have approved a new constitution that hands the president sweeping new powers. Some seventy per cent backed the change, which lets the head of state appoint and dismiss the prime minister and cabinet, reshape the government at will, and dissolve parliament in a crisis. The main opposition boycotted the vote, warning it concentrates too much power in one pair of hands. They have a point, and history on their side: Guinea-Bissau has endured coup after coup since independence, and strongmen rarely hand power back once the constitution has been rewritten to enlarge it. It is a small country's version of a global drift — the quiet, legal hollowing-out of the checks that make a democracy more than an election.
|
|
|
This Week · Lagos & Kampala
Uber gives up on two African markets
A small corporate retreat carried a larger message this week. Uber announced it is pulling out of Nigeria and Uganda altogether, abandoning markets it had courted for more than a decade. The official reasons are prosaic — rising fuel costs, fierce local competition, thinning margins. The subtext is harder. When a company built to operate anywhere decides that two of Africa's biggest economies are no longer worth the trouble, it says something about how the wider world is starting to price the continent's risk. Weak currencies, dear fuel, unpredictable rules and now a receding tide of foreign capital compound one another. Africa has the youngest population and some of the fastest growth on earth, yet it keeps struggling to hold the investment that would put them to work. This is the quieter crisis: not a war or a coup, but the slow withdrawal of the outside money a rising continent needs.
|
|
|
Noise Cancellation — The Week, Filtered
|
|
A brutal week, and a clarifying one. Strip away the daily lurches and the picture is grimly coherent.
|
|
MovedThe war widened. The US-Iran conflict came off its month-long pause and escalated fast: strikes inside Iran, drones on Kuwait and Bahrain, tankers and even a wedding party hit. Oil pushed toward a hundred dollars. This is the engine driving everything else.
MovedThe rate cut died. Warsh's hawkish signal, plus the oil shock, flipped the market from expecting cuts to pricing a hike, the odds crossing seventy per cent. The fifteen-year age of ever-cheaper money is ending — and even Japan's bond yields, the world's tamest, hit a thirty-year high.
HeldThe consumer's cushion thinned. The jobs market cooled — weak private hiring, rising layoffs — but had not collapsed by week's end. This morning's official payrolls will show how much give is left.
MovedGold woke up. After buckling on the hawkish Fed, gold roared back to near a record. It is voting, as it has all year, on the soundness of the money itself.
NoiseThe daily direction of stocks. Up on Wednesday, down on Thursday, whichever way the last headline pointed. The week's real trend was not in the share index. It was in the oil price and the bond yield.
|
|
|
Carry two things into next week: whether this morning's jobs number tips the Fed toward the hike it is now flirting with — and whether the Gulf war, having widened onto civilians and neighbours, can be contained at all. The rest is noise.
|
|
Enjoy the weekend. The oil price will not rest — but you should.
|
|
The Back Page |
|
Where the week's noise ends, a longer story. Fifty-three years ago, a war in the Middle East sent the price of oil through the roof and gave the West a decade of a new and frightening word: stagflation.
The West · 1973–74
The autumn the oil ran out
For a generation after the war, the rich world ran on cheap oil and barely thought about it. Petrol was pennies and factories hummed, and the great post-war boom was built, quite literally, on a fuel that seemed endless and all but free. Then, in October 1973, war returned to the Middle East. Egypt and Syria attacked Israel, and when the West rushed to Israel's aid, the Arab oil producers reached for the one weapon they held in common: they cut production and embargoed the countries that had helped. Within weeks, the price of a barrel had quadrupled.
The effect was seismic, and nothing like a normal price rise. Petrol stations ran dry; America imposed rationing, drivers queuing for hours and allowed fuel only on alternate days by the last digit of their number plate. But the truly disorienting part was economic. The textbooks of the age held that inflation and recession could not happen together — a weak economy was meant to cool prices, a hot one to lift them. Now the West got both at once: soaring prices and stalling growth, a combination so unfamiliar it needed a new name. They called it stagflation, and it would haunt the decade.
It broke the people in charge. The central bankers of the 1970s, trained for a gentler world, could not tame it. Every time they raised rates to fight inflation, they deepened the recession; every time they cut to fight the recession, prices ran hotter. The misery dragged on for years, through a second oil shock in 1979. It ended only when a new Federal Reserve chairman, Paul Volcker, broke the fever the one way anyone could find — with interest rates so brutally high they engineered a deep recession on purpose. It worked. It also ended careers, bankrupted farms and defined a generation's politics.
· · ·
Why drag all this up now? Because this week has the same opening scene. A war in the Middle East. An oil price surging toward triple figures. A central-bank chief, in Kevin Warsh, warning that inflation is not beaten and rates may yet have to rise — even as the economy shows the first signs of a slowdown he cannot easily cushion. The differences are real: America now pumps its own oil, and the world is less thirsty per dollar of output than it was. But the shape is unmistakable, and so is the warning that 1973 left behind. Oil shocks do not pass in a quarter; they can bend a decade. And the hardest lesson of the last one is the one the market is only starting to relearn: once inflation and war get into the system together, there is no painless way to get them out. ■
|
|
Please tell us what is working and what is not — just reply. |
| |
|
The Clarmond Daily is published by Clarmond Wealth Limited, 118a Kensington Church Street, London W8 4BH. Clarmond Wealth Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The Clarmond Daily is provided for information and general interest purposes only and therefore does not constitute regulated activity. Nothing in this publication constitutes investment advice, a personal recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security, investment or financial instrument. The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of investments and the income from them may fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Clarmond Wealth Limited makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein and accepts no liability for any loss arising from its use. Produced and distributed in the United Kingdom and subject to English law.
You are receiving this communication because you are a contact of Clarmond Wealth Limited. If you no longer wish to receive it, please use the unsubscribe link below.
© Clarmond Wealth Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction or distribution of this publication, in whole or in part, without prior written consent is prohibited.
|
|
